Journal
MECHANICS OF MATERIALS
Volume 179, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2023.104582
Keywords
Cyclic plasticity; Isotropic hardening; Distortional hardening; Yield surface
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In this paper, the authors analyze the assumption of the dependence of yield surface evolution on accumulated plasticity in cyclic plasticity models. Through carefully designed experiments, they measure the scalar variable and track the yield surface evolution, finding that this variable is insufficient to describe isotropic or distortional hardening of the investigated steel, thus invalidating the commonly used assumption. The results highlight the need for developing and verifying new isotropic and distortional hardening laws.
In this paper, we analyze one specific assumption used in many cyclic plasticity models: The dependence of the yield surface evolution on the accumulated plasticity, i.e., the time-integrated plastic multiplier. We measure this scalar variable in carefully designed experiments and track the yield surface evolution. Our results show that this variable is insufficient to describe the isotropic or distortional hardening of the investigated steel, invalidating the commonly used assumption. The results highlight requirements for developing and verifying new isotropic and distortional hardening laws.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available