4.7 Article

Piecewise-linear modelling with automated feature selection for Li-ion battery end-of-life prognosis

Journal

MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING
Volume 184, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109612

Keywords

Feature selection; Linear model; Piecewise; Lithium-ion; Degradation; Health; Bayes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study compares a piecewise-linear approach and a Gaussian process regression model in battery health forecasting and finds that they perform equally well in terms of median error on the training dataset, with the piecewise-linear approach performing slightly better at the 95th percentile of error. The feature selection process also demonstrates the benefit of limiting correlation between inputs. Furthermore, additional trials confirm the robustness of the piecewise-linear approach to changes in input size and availability of training data.
The complex nature of lithium-ion battery degradation has led to many machine learning -based approaches for health forecasting being proposed in the literature. However, machine learning using sophisticated models can be computationally expensive, and although linear models are faster they can also be inflexible. Piecewise-linear models offer a compromise- a fast and flexible alternative that is not as computationally expensive as techniques such as neural networks or Gaussian process regression. Here, a piecewise-linear approach for battery health forecasting, including an automated feature selection step, is compared to a Gaussian process regression model and found to perform equally well in terms of the median error on a training dataset, and indeed somewhat better at the 95th percentile of error. The feature selection process demonstrates the benefit of limiting the correlation between inputs. Further trials found that the piecewise-linear approach was robust to changing input size and availability of training data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available