4.7 Article

Research on a remaining useful life prediction method for degradation angle identification two-stage degradation process

Journal

MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING
Volume 184, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109747

Keywords

Remaining useful life; Two-stage model; Wiener process; Degradation angle; Parameters estimation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a two-stage remaining useful life prediction model based on the degradation angle (DA), which accurately identifies the change point between stages and matches different degradation states using different drift functions, leading to improved prediction accuracy.
Two-stage prediction methods based on Wiener processes are widely used to describe the degradation process of components. However, a single type of drift function cannot accurately track the two-stage degradation path of the component for long-range and identify the change point between stages, which decreased prediction accuracy of models. Therefore, this paper proposes a new two-stage remaining useful life prediction model, which uses the degradation angle (DA) to solve the above problems. Firstly, the idea of DA is proposed to accurately identify the change point between slow degradation stage (SDS) and accelerated degradation stage (ADS) so that different drift functions match different degradation states of the component. Secondly, according to the definition of the DA and the first hitting time, this paper respectively obtains the probability density function of the SDS and the ADS to estimate the component degradation state. Then, a three-step method is proposed to estimate the unknown parameters in the model and update them by Bayesian method. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed method is verified by bearing accelerated degradation experiment and XJTU-SY Bearing Datasets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available