4.7 Article

A compact inchworm piezoelectric actuator with high speed: Design, modeling, and experimental evaluation

Journal

MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING
Volume 184, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109704

Keywords

Compact inchworm actuator; Flextensional mechanism; High speed; Stiffness optimization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a compact inchworm piezoelectric actuator with two multi-function driving feet, utilizing two piezoelectric stacks. By optimizing the stiffness and efficiently utilizing the deformations of the driving feet, high output speed and stable step process are achieved.
Inchworm piezoelectric actuators are usually composed of three or more piezoelectric stacks, which makes their structures and circuits sophisticated. Although a variety of inchworm piezoelectric actuators driven by fewer piezoelectric stacks have been proposed to realize the simplification of the traditional structures. It is still difficult to inherit the advantage of large output force and achieve high output speed without backward motion for a simplified inchworm actuator. Here, we present a compact inchworm piezoelectric actuator with two multi-function driving feet, in which only two piezoelectric stacks are utilized. The deformations of the driving feet are utilized efficiently by the proposed working principle, and four steps in each cycle are realized, which improve the output speed of the proposed actuator. The stiffness optimization is carried out to obtain a stable step characteristic and a high output force. Under a voltage of 150 V and a frequency of 50 Hz, the actuator achieved a maximum speed of 2081.16 mu m/s, a carrying load larger than 6.442 kg and an output force of 14 N. Furthermore, this actuator also achieved a stable step process without backward motion under a carrying load of 6.442 kg.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available