4.4 Article

Cutting parameters optimization of hybrid fiber composite during drilling

Journal

MATERIALS TESTING
Volume 65, Issue 2, Pages 291-302

Publisher

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/mt-2022-0280

Keywords

delamination; drilling; hybrid composite material; optimization; thrust force

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Delamination, the major problem in drilling composite materials, can be minimized by optimizing cutting parameters. The delamination behavior of a glass/carbon/aramid fiber reinforced hybrid composite during drilling was investigated. Experimentation and statistical analysis were conducted to determine the optimal cutting parameters. The results showed that low cutting velocity and feed rate under dry conditions can reduce thrust force and minimize delamination.
Delamination is the most important problem encountered in drilling composite materials. This problem can be minimized by optimizing the cutting parameters. In this study delamination behavior of glass/carbon/aramid fiber reinforced hybrid composite was investigated during the drilling operation. Experiments were planned according to Taguchi's L27 orthogonal array. Cutting velocity (20 m min(-1), 40 m min(-1), and 60 m min(-1)), feed rate (0.04, 0.08, and 0.12 mm rev(-1)), and cooling type (wet, air, and dry) were selected as cutting parameters. Thrust force was measured during the drilling operation, and the delamination factor for entrance was calculated after the tests. Optimization of the parameters was evaluated using the signal/noise ratio approach. The effectiveness of parameters on results was determined by analysis of variance (ANOVA). In addition, regression equations were obtained with the response surface method (RSM). According to the optimization results, the thrust force can be reduced with low cutting velocity and low feed rate under dry conditions. It was concluded that low cutting velocity and the feed rate should be applied under dry conditions to reduce delamination.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available