4.7 Article

Joining of dissimilar bulk metallic glasses with non-common supercooled liquid regions

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2023.144608

Keywords

Joining; Supercooled liquid phase; Bulk metallic glass

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We successfully joined dissimilar bulk metallic glasses with non-common supercooled liquid regions via pulse current, resulting in an amorphous structure joint with excellent tensile shear strength. The joining process is derived from the Lasocka equation, which shows that the glass transition temperature and crystallization temperature of bulk metallic glasses increase with the heating rate. This method offers promise for scaling up metallic glass sizes and manufacturing amorphous alloy components with complex performance requirements.
We first successfully joined dissimilar bulk metallic glasses with non-common supercooled liquid regions via pulse current and obtained an amorphous structure joint, which exhibits an excellent tensile shear strength of similar to 1.7 GPa. The joining process is derived from the Lasocka equation that the glass transition temperature and crystallization temperature of bulk metallic glasses increase with the heating rate, and the supercooled liquid region shifts toward the high-temperature region simultaneously. The difference in heating rate dependence of glass transition temperature and crystallization temperature of dissimilar bulk metallic glasses can be amplified at high heating rates and overlap the originally non-overlapped supercooled liquid phase region simultaneously. Especially, a new parameter K was introduced to screen the composition combinations of dissimilar bulk metallic glasses for this method. This method is a promising candidate for scaling up metallic glass sizes, realizing the successful joining of dissimilar BMGs, and providing a new idea for manufacturing amorphous alloy components with complex performance requirements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available