4.6 Article

Grain refinement of A517 steel by inoculation with Al-5Ti-B master alloy

Journal

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
Volume 296, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.127320

Keywords

Casting; Low -carbon low -alloy steel; Grain refinement; Pinning effect; Mechanical properties

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The edge-to-edge matching model was used to identify TiB2 as a potential grain refiner for high temperature delta-ferrite in low carbon steels. By adding TiB2 particles using Al-5Ti-B master alloy into A517 steel, significant grain refinement was achieved after reheating and air cooling. The grain refinement was attributed to Ti-containing nanometre-sized precipitates along prior austenite grain boundaries inhibiting the grain growth.
The edge-to-edge matching model was used to identify TiB2 as a potential grain refiner to refine the high temperature delta-ferrite in low carbon steels. To effectively introduce the grain refiner, Al-5Ti-B master alloy (MA) was used to add TiB2 particles into an A517 steel. However, there was no grain refinement in the as-cast A517 steel, attributed to the decomposition of TiB2 particles in the molten A517 steel, into Ti and B. As a result, BN particles formed on the pre-existing Al2O3 particles were detected within prior austenite grains. Nevertheless, there was significant grain refinement after reheating the A517 ingots to 1150 degrees C, isothermally holding for 2 h and air cooling. The austenite grain size of the reheated A517 steel was decreased from 318 +/- 70 mu m to 38 +/- 4 mu m using 0.1 wt% Al-5Ti-B MA. Grain refinement was caused by Ti-containing nanometre-sized precipitates along prior austenite grain boundaries inhibiting the grain growth. The grain refinement improved the strength and ductility of ingots after reheating and improved workability for the production of hot worked products.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available