4.7 Article

Axial hysteretic behaviour of wire rope isolators: Experiments and modelling

Journal

MATERIALS & DESIGN
Volume 225, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.111436

Keywords

Experimental tests; Asymmetric hysteresis loops; Hysteretic model; Wire Rope Isolators

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper describes an experimental campaign that aims to study the dynamic response of four different helical Wire Rope Isolators (WRIs) loaded along the axial direction. A total of seventy-one tests were conducted with ten cycles of sinusoidal displacement as input to each of them. The dynamic response of the WRIs was analyzed by varying input properties and simulated using a recently developed hysteretic model derived from a new class of uniaxial phenomenological models. The influence of axial preload and wire rope diameter on the dynamic behavior of the tested WRIs is also discussed, and a close agreement between predicted hysteresis loops and experimental ones has been achieved.
An experimental campaign aiming to study the dynamic response of four different helical Wire Rope Isolators (WRIs) loaded along the axial direction is described in the paper. A total of seventy-one tests have been carried out by applying as input, to each of them, ten cycles of sinusoidal displacement. Specifically, the dynamic response of the WRIs has been analysed by varying input properties, such as amplitudes and frequencies, and simulated by means of a recently developed hysteretic model derived from a new class of uniaxial phenomenological models. For completeness, the influence of the axial preload as well as of the wire rope diameter on the dynamic behaviour of the tested WRIs is also discussed. In particular, a close agreement between predicted hysteresis loops, having asymmetric shape, and experimental ones has been achieved. CO 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available