4.7 Article

Rock physics analysis from predicted Poisson's ratio using RVFL based on Wild Geese Algorithm in scarab gas field in WDDM concession, Egypt

Journal

MARINE AND PETROLEUM GEOLOGY
Volume 147, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2022.105949

Keywords

Scarab gas field; Poisson?s ratio; West delta deep marine (WDDM); Rock physics analysis; Random vector functional link (RVFL); Wild geese algorithm (WGA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to predict Poisson's ratio using ordinary well log and seismic data through machine learning algorithms. The Wild Geese Algorithm is used to determine the best configuration, enhancing the prediction process. Rock physics templates are used to interpret lithology and pore-fluid.
Some of the important rock physics parameters, such as the shear-wave velocity and Poisson's ratio, are conventionally calculated from compressional and shear sonic well logs. Although these parameters are vital for geomechanical purposes, these types of shear sonic logs are rarely recorded for most wells. Therefore, this study aims to use ordinary well log and seismic data to predict the Poisson's ratio using some of the machine learning algorithms that are based on a proposed model calculated from a modified version of the Random Vector Functional Link (RVFL) using the Wild Geese Algorithm (WGA). This is applied as a case study in the Scarab gas field in the West Delta Deep Marine (WDDM) concession, Egypt. The main aim of using WGA is to determine the best configuration from the parameters of RVFL to enhance the process of prediction. The rock physics templates are used for interpreting the lithology and pore-fluid from well log data and RVFL-WGA. This is achieved using the cross-plot of P-impedance versus Poisson's ratio, Lambda-Rho versus Mu-Rho, Poisson's ratio versus bulk modulus and P-impedance versus Vp/Vs ratio from both methods. All cross plots are color-coded by the shale volume and hydrocarbon saturation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available