4.7 Article

Inactivation kinetics of Bacillus atrophaeus in liquid hydrogen peroxide for aseptic package sterilization

Journal

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 170, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2022.114074

Keywords

Aseptic processing; Liquid hydrogen peroxide; Kinetic parameters; Log-linear model; Weibull model

Funding

  1. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch project [1023114]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to develop a methodology for estimating the kinetic inactivation parameters of B. atrophaeus using liquid hydrogen peroxide as a sterilant. The log-linear and Weibull models were found to be suitable for estimating the sterilization process at different temperatures and peroxide concentrations, with reasonably accurate parameter estimates.
Liquid hydrogen peroxide is used as a common sterilant for the aseptic packaging materials. Based on the Food Safety Objective (FSO) for specific products, a surrogate organism, Bacillus atrophaeus, is used to validate the sterilization processes. This study aims to develop a methodology for the kinetic inactivation parameter esti-mation of B. atrophaeus. Spores of B. atrophaeus were challenged with various peroxide concentrations (20%, 28%, and 33%; v/v) and temperatures such as 23, 55, 71.1, and 82.2 degrees C. The log-linear and Weibull models were used for the inactivation models for liquid peroxide at different temperatures. The parameters were estimated at a reference temperature of 80 degrees C for log-linear and Weibull models. With peroxide concentrations of 20, 28, and 33%, the log-linear model estimated D values were 0.95, 0.47, and 0.08 min and z values were 94.67, 86.86, and 41 degrees C, respectively. The Weibull model delta values were 0.31, 0.23, and 0.05 min with a z value of 85.18, 81.23, and 41.39 degrees C for 20, 28, and 33% peroxide, respectively. The RMSE values varied from 0.60 to 0.79 log CFU/ml, the sum of the squares was between 27.3 and 39.7, and the parameters' relative errors were less than 6%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available