4.7 Article

Real-life disease monitoring in follicular lymphoma patients using liquid biopsy ultra-deep sequencing and PET/CT

Journal

LEUKEMIA
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages 659-669

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41375-022-01803-x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we screened follicular lymphoma patients for liquid biopsy MRD biomarkers using NGS panel and found trackable mutations in a majority of the samples. We used ultra-deep sequencing to track these mutations in follow-up samples and found that positive LiqBio-MRD correlated with a higher risk of progression during treatment. The combination of LiqBio-MRD and PET/CT provided a sensitive and specific identification of patients who progressed in less than two years. This non-invasive approach should be considered in future clinical trials.
In the present study, we screened 84 Follicular Lymphoma patients for somatic mutations suitable as liquid biopsy MRD biomarkers using a targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel. We found trackable mutations in 95% of the lymph node samples and 80% of the liquid biopsy baseline samples. Then, we used an ultra-deep sequencing approach with 2 center dot 10(-4) sensitivity (LiqBio-MRD) to track those mutations on 151 follow-up liquid biopsy samples from 54 treated patients. Positive LiqBio-MRD at first-line therapy correlated with a higher risk of progression both at the interim evaluation (HRINT 11.0, 95% CI 2.10-57.7, p = 0.005) and at the end of treatment (HREOT, HR 19.1, 95% CI 4.10-89.4, p < 0.001). Similar results were observed by PET/CT Deauville score, with a median PFS of 19 months vs. NR (p < 0.001) at the interim and 13 months vs. NR (p < 0.001) at EOT. LiqBio-MRD and PET/CT combined identified the patients that progressed in less than two years with 88% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Our results demonstrate that LiqBio-MRD is a robust and non-invasive approach, complementary to metabolic imaging, for identifying FL patients at high risk of failure during the treatment and should be considered in future response-adapted clinical trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available