4.5 Article

Modeling Physical Stability of Amorphous Solids Based on Temperature and Moisture Stresses

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
Volume 105, Issue 9, Pages 2932-2939

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2016.03.029

Keywords

amorphous; solid dispersion; physical stability; isothermal microcalorimetry; mathematical model; crystallization; nucleation; crystal growth

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Isothermal microcalorimetry was utilized to monitor the crystallization process of amorphous ritonavir (RTV) and its hydroxypropylmethylcellulose acetate succinate-based amorphous solid dispersion under various stressed conditions. An empirical model was developed: ln(tau) = ln(A) + E-a/RT- b.wc,where tau is the crystallization induction period, A is a pre-exponential factor, E-a is the apparent activation energy, b is the moisture sensitivity parameter, and wc is water content. To minimize the propagation of errors associated with the estimates, a nonlinear approach was used to calculate mean estimates and confidence intervals. The physical stability of neat amorphous RTV and RTV in hydroxypropylmethylcellulose acetate succinate solid dispersions was found to be mainly governed by the nucleation kinetic process. The impact of polymers and moisture on the crystallization process can be quantitatively described by E-a and b in this Arrhenius-type model. The good agreement between the measured values under some less stressful test conditions and those predicted, reflected by the slope and R-2 of the correlation plot of these 2 sets of data on a natural logarithm scale, indicates its predictability of long-term physical stability of amorphous RTV in solid dispersions. To further improve the model, more understanding of the impact of temperature and moisture on the amorphous physical stability and fundamentals regarding nucleation and crystallization is needed. (C) 2016 American Pharmacists Association (R). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available