Evaluation and Prediction of Formation of Heat-Affected Zone and Mechanical Properties According to Welding Method of STS 316L/A516-70N Clad Plates

Two welding methods of FCAW (Flux-cored arc welding) + FCAW, and FCAW + GTAW (Gas tungsten arc welding) were compared to identify effective routes for STS 316L/A516-70N clad stainless steel. Since the welding speed of the FCAW + GTAW welding method is slower than that of the FCAW + FCAW welding method, the amount of heat input is large, the size of the heat-affected zone formed is larger, and the amount of angular deformation is also large. The microstructure and deformation of the welding specimens were investigated by computational simulation, and the results were compared with calculated results for actual specimens. The results were very similar, thus confirming the high accuracy of the calculation. After measuring the hardness value of the actual welded specimens, the specimen welded by the FCAW + FCAW welding method was found to have a higher hardness value. The hardness of the welded portion of the FCAW + GTAW specimen tests tended to remain at nearly the same value throughout the specimen, indicating that the FCAW + GTAW hardness profile is desirable. In the computer simulation, butt welding was used to set the optimal heat source conditions for the two welding methods, and the effect of heat formed during welding was confirmed using the thermal analysis results according to the conditions. Based on the butt welding conditions, the residual stress and strain for the two welding methods are discussed, using manufacture of pressure vessels.

Automated summary

Two welding methods, FCAW + FCAW and FCAW + GTAW, were compared for their effectiveness in STS 316L/A516-70N clad stainless steel. It was found that the FCAW + GTAW method has a larger heat input, resulting in a larger heat-affected zone and greater angular deformation compared to the FCAW + FCAW method. Computational simulation results were highly accurate and consistent with actual specimens. The FCAW + FCAW welding method produced specimens with higher hardness values, while the FCAW + GTAW welding method resulted in a desirable hardness profile.