4.6 Article

Ionic liquid-based ultrasound-assisted extraction and aqueous two-phase system for analysis of caffeoylquinic acids from Flos Lonicerae Japonicae

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS
Volume 120, Issue -, Pages 134-141

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2015.12.019

Keywords

Ionic liquid-based ultrasonic-assisted extraction; Aqueous two-phase system; Response surface methodology; Caffeoylquinic acids; Flos Lonicerae Japonicae

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81102787, 81560636]
  2. Young Scientists Culture Project of Jiang Xi Province [20142BCB23022]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province [20133ACB21005, 20151BAB215039]
  4. Health and Family Planning Commission of Jiangxi Province [2015B048]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, an ionic liquid-based ultrasonic-assisted extraction (ILUAE) method was developed to extract caffeoylquinic acids (CQAs) from Flos Lonicerae Japonicae (FLJ). ILUAE parameters were optimized by response surface methodology, including IL concentration, ultrasonic time, and liquid-solid ratio. Optimized ILUAE approach gained the highest extraction yields of 28.53, 18.21, 3.84 mg/g for 3-O-caffeoylquinic acid (Cl), 3,5-di-O-caffeoylquinic acid (C2), 3,4-di-O-caffeoylquinic acid (C3), respectively. C1-C3 are the three most abundant CQAs compounds in FLJ. The method showed comparable extraction yield and shorter extraction time compared with conventional extraction techniques. Subsequently, an aqueous two-phase system (ATPS) was applied in extraction solutions. Two trace CQAs, 5-O-caffeoylquinic acid (C4) and 4,5-di-O-caffeoylquinic acid (C5), were significantly enriched with signal to noise values increasing from less than 10 to higher than 1475. The results indicated that ILUAE and ATPS are efficient and environmentally-friendly sample extraction and enrichment techniques for CQAs from herbal medicines. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available