4.7 Article

A novel evidence combination rule based on compromise conflict indicator and conflict focal element

Journal

KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
Volume 257, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2022.109898

Keywords

Combination rule; Conflict measurement; Evidence theory; Focal element

Funding

  1. Application of Collaborative Precision Positioning Service [2016YFB0501805-1]
  2. National Development and Reform Commission [JZNYYY001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article introduces the application of the Dempster-Shafer evidence theory (DSET) in the fusion of multisource information and points out the issues with using Dempster's Combination Rule (DCR). To solve this problem, a new combination rule is proposed and its advantages over existing methods are demonstrated through experiments.
The Dempster-Shafer evidence theory (DSET) has been commonly used in the fusion of multisource in-formation in various fields. Owing to the normalization process based on the conflict measurement, the conclusion when fusing high conflict evidence is counter-intuitive when using Dempster's Combination Rule (DCR). To solve the DCR issue, several combination rules have been developed. However, each of them has unreasonable behaviors in certain cases. In this study, the set of mathematical properties that must be satisfied by all the combinatorial rules is further refined. Under the framework of DSET, a novel combination rule is proposed by comprehensively considering the conflict focal elements and metrics. The conflict measurement is achieved through the newly proposed compromise conflict indicator. The advantages of the proposed combination rule over the existing methods are demonstrated by experiments on a few numerical examples and applications.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available