4.5 Review

Medial pivot design does not yield superior results compared to posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials

Journal

KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY
Volume 31, Issue 9, Pages 3684-3700

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-07238-2

Keywords

Medial pivot; Medial stabilised; Posterior stabilised; Total knee replacement; Total knee arthroplasty

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This meta-analysis compared the functional and radiological outcomes as well as gait parameters between medial pivot (MP) and posterior-stabilised (PS) knee designs. The results showed no statistical difference in range of motion, patient-related outcome measures, walking speed, length of stay, radiographic alignment, and complications rates between the two groups. Therefore, MP knee design does not have a better impact on patient satisfaction compared to the traditional PS knees.
Purpose The aim of this meta-analysis was a comparison between medial pivot (MP) and posterior-stabilised (PS) knee designs regarding functional and radiological outcomes as well as gait parameters. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Science Direct and Clinical Trials.gov from conception up to April 2022, to identify eligible randomised control trials (RCTs). The extracted data were analysed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. Results Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria, enrolling 1101 patients who underwent 1242 total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). A total of 1158 TKAs (581 MP/577 PS) were included in the quantitative analysis. Mean follow-up ranged from 6 months up to 6.6 years. MP knees showed comparable range of motion (ROM) with PS design 1, 2 and 4 years postoperatively (p = 0.2, p = 0.25, p = 0.34, respectively). No statistical difference was found in patient-related outcome measures (PROMs) (p > 0.05). Mean walking speed (MWS), length of stay (LOS), radiographic alignment and complications rates were also similar between the two groups (p > 0.05). Discussion The present meta-analysis demonstrated that the theoretical biomechanical advantage of MP implants does not have a better impact on patient satisfaction compared to the traditional PS knees.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available