4.5 Article

Sensitivity to Change of the SAMANTA Questionnaire, a Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Diagnostic Tool, After 1 Year of Hormonal Treatment

Journal

JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH
Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages 208-215

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2022.0155

Keywords

heavy menstrual bleeding; screening tool; visual analog scale; VAS; quality of life

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study assessed the value of the SAMANTA questionnaire in monitoring hormonal treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) in clinical practice. The findings suggest that the SAMANTA questionnaire is a valuable tool for monitoring HMB treatment.
Background: The validated SAMANTA questionnaire allows identification of women with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB); that is, with excessive menstrual bleeding that interferes with quality of life (QoL). We assessed its value for monitoring HMB treatment in clinical practice.Material and Methods: This is a prospective observational study conducted between December 2018 and March 2021 in consecutively recruited women with HMB attending gynecologists' offices who started a hormonal treatment. Sociodemographic characteristics were recorded at enrollment. At baseline and month 12, we assessed the HMB (SAMANTA questionnaire), the global impression of menstrual bleeding severity in patients (PGI-S) and clinicians (CGI-S), and the QoL (SF36). At month 12, we assessed the global impression of menstrual bleeding change in patients (PGI-C) and clinicians (CGI-C). Changes in SAMANTA questionnaire score at month 12 were compared with the presence of amenorrhea and changes in blood loss, menstrual period duration, and PGI-S, PGI-C, CGI-S, and CGI-C.Results: The study included 371 women aged 41.2 +/- 6.5 years, 87% of whom were using the levonorgestrel intrauterine system. The SAMANTA questionnaire score significantly decreased in 97.3% of women. The decrease was greater in women reporting a reduction in blood loss, shorter menstrual bleeding duration, or a strong improvement in menstrual bleeding severity (PGI-S and CGI-S) or amount (PGI-C and CGI-C) (p < 0.001 for all), but not amenorrhea. SF-36 domains improved significantly; changes being inversely associated with changes in the SAMANTA questionnaire score.Conclusions: The SAMANTA questionnaire seems a valuable tool for monitoring hormonal treatment for HMB.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03751800.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available