4.6 Article

Minimally Invasive Thymectomy Could Be Attempted for Locally Advanced Thymic Malignancies: A Real-World Study With Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages 640-649

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2022.12.013

Keywords

Thymic tumor; Thymectomy; Minimally invasive surgery; Median sternotomy; Video-assisted thoracoscopic

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increasing evidence supports the use of minimally invasive thymectomy (MIT) for early stage thymic malignancies compared to open median sternotomy thymectomy (MST). However, the feasibility of MIT for locally advanced disease is unclear. This study found that MIT can be safely attempted in carefully selected patients with locally advanced thymic tumors without compromising surgical outcomes. Patients may benefit from the less traumatic procedure and achieve comparable long-term oncologic outcomes.
Introduction: Increasing evidence supports minimally invasive thymectomy (MIT) for early stage thymic malig-nancies than open median sternotomy thymectomy (MST). Nevertheless, whether MIT could be attempted for locally advanced disease remains unclear. Methods: The clinical data of consecutive patients with stage T2-3NxM0 (eighth edition TNM staging) thymic ma-lignancies who underwent MIT or MST were identified from a prospectively maintained database. The co-resected structures were rated with a resection index to evaluate surgical difficulty. The impact of surgical approach on treatment outcomes was investigated through propensity score-matched analysis and multivariable analysis. Results: From January 2008 to December 2019, a total of 128 patients were included; MIT was initially attempted in 58 (45.3%) cases, and eight (13.8%) were converted to MST during surgery. The conversion group had similar periop-erative outcomes to the MST group, except for a longer operation time. After propensity score matching, the resection index scores were similar between the MIT and MST groups (3.5 versus 3.7, p = 0.773). The MIT group had considerably less blood loss (p < 0.001), fewer post-operative complications (p = 0.048), a shorter duration of chest drainage (p < 0.001), and a shorter hospitalization duration (p < 0.001) than the MST group. The 5-year freedom from recurrence rate was not different between the two groups (78.2% versus 78.5%, p = 0.942). In multivariable analysis, surgical approach was not associated with freedom from recurrence (p = 0.727).Conclusions: MIT could be safely attempted in carefully selected patients with locally advanced thymic tumors. Conversion did not compromise the surgical outcomes. Patients may benefit from the less traumatic procedure and thus better recovery, with comparable long-term oncologic outcomes.(c) 2023 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available