4.7 Article

Effect of entrainers with different boiling point sequences on the design and performance for side-stream extractive distillation processes

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtice.2023.104698

Keywords

Extractive distillation; Side -stream extractive distillation; Intermediate boiling solvents; CO 2 emissions; Total annual cost

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The separation of acetone/n-heptane was studied, and it was found that the side-stream extractive distillation process using p-xylene as the entrainer showed the best economic and environmental performance for this separation.
Background: An azeotropic mixture of acetone and n-heptane is commonly found in many pharmaceutical wastewaters. In this work, the separation of acetone / n-heptane was studied using intermediate- and highboiling-point entrainers (benzene and p-xylene, respectively).Methods: To maximize the economic benefits and mitigate the economic and environmental impact of the separation process, traditional extractive distillation and side-stream extractive distillation processes were developed for different entrainers. The sequential iteration method was employed to optimize the extractive distillation process, with the total annual cost as the constraint objective.Significant findings: The results show that p-xylene can facilitate the separation of acetone / n-heptane, with high efficiency and low energy consumption, when using a double distillation column. Among the four separation processes developed, the p-xylene side-stream extractive distillation process delivers the best economic and environmental performance, with a total annual cost of 6.04 x 105 $/y and CO2 emissions of 1114.66 kg/y. Compared to the case of traditional p-xylene extractive distillation and benzene side-stream extractive distillation processes, the total annual cost of the p-xylene side-stream extractive distillation process was reduced by 9.56% and 49.22%, respectively, while the corresponding CO2 emissions were reduced by 15.71% and 48.85%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available