4.7 Review

Agronomic biofortification of forage crops with zinc and copper for enhancing nutritive potential: a systematic review

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
Volume 103, Issue 4, Pages 1631-1643

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.12353

Keywords

mineral enrichment; forage crops; copper; zinc; biofortification

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many developing countries are facing increasingly serious deficiencies of micronutrients in forage crops, which affect animal health and productivity. Biofortification is a promising method to address these deficiencies, with foliar application and agronomic methods showing the most promising results in enhancing micronutrient content in animal fodder.
Many developing countries are facing a silent increase in deficiency of micronutrients in forage crops that results in decreased levels of essential nutrients in animals. Micronutrients are essential not only for basic metabolic processes of forage crops but also for sustaining animal health. Forage productivity and quality are severely affected by soil micronutrients deficiencies, especially zinc and copper. This review summarizes the literature highlighting the significance of different methodologies used to increase the biomass and quality of forage so as to enhance the micronutrient content of the forage crops through biofortification. Biofortification is a promising and sustainable agriculture-based strategy to reduce micronutrient deficiency in crops. The experiments and trials conducted at different locations of the world showed that copper and zinc concentrations in animal fodders can be enhanced through the process of foliar application. Additionally, agronomic biofortification showed more promising results, and thus is an outstanding, fast, and cost-effective technique for the immediate enrichment of forage in order to overcome malnutrition in animals. (c) 2022 Society of Chemical Industry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available