4.3 Article

Voltammetric and spectroscopic studies of water/formamide ratios in the production of the cerium (III) hexacyanoferrate (II) nanoparticles

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 70, Issue 1, Pages 87-100

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jccs.202200449

Keywords

cerium (III) hexacyanoferrate (II); electrochemical sense; L-dopamine; metal nanoparticles; voltammetry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study demonstrates the rapid synthesis of CeHCF solid nanoparticles using different water/formamide ratios as solvent. The CeHCF nanoparticles were characterized using various techniques including FTIR, XRD, SEM, zeta potential and CV. Modified electrodes exhibited a well-defined redox pair and CeHCF-1 (100:0) showed sensitivity towards L-dopamine with a linear signal response and good sensitivity.
The present study describes the simple and fast preparation of Cerium (III) hexacyanoferrate (II) (CeHCF) solid nanoparticles at three different water/formamide (%) ratios used as solvent (v/v) (100:0, 80:20, 0:100). CeHCF nanoparticles (Nps) were characterized by fourier transform infrared pectroscopy (FTIR), x-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), zeta potential and cyclic voltammetry (CV). Electrodes modified with CeHCF presented a well-defined redox pair with formal potential (E-o') of approximately 0.29 V (vs. Ag/AgCl(sat) attributed to the Fe2 +/Fe3+ redox pair in the presence of cerium (III)). The Nps in the three systems investigates, presents a random size distribution to different surface, where most were distributed between 20 and 160 nm. Considering the three investigated systems, only CeHCF-1 (100:0) was sensitive to L-dopamine, presenting a linear signal region as a function of L-dopamine concentrations, with a limit of detection (LD) of 0.125 mmol L-1, limit of quantification (LQ) of 0.419 mmol L-1 and amperometric sensitivity (S) of 148.16 mu A mmol L-1.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available