4.6 Article

Valid Model-Free Spatial Prediction

Journal

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2022.2147531

Keywords

Conformal prediction; Gaussian process; Kriging; Nonstationary; Plausibility

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DMS-1638521, DMS-1811802]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01ES031651, R01ES027892]
  3. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology [3800.2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents a new model-free nonparametric spatial prediction approach based on conformal prediction, which is applicable to complex spatial statistics problems. Numerical experiments demonstrate that the proposed prediction method has higher efficiency and validity for large datasets in various spatial settings.
Predicting the response at an unobserved location is a fundamental problem in spatial statistics. Given the difficulty in modeling spatial dependence, especially in nonstationary cases, model-based prediction intervals are at risk of misspecification bias that can negatively affect their validity. Here we present a new approach for model-free nonparametric spatial prediction based on the conformal prediction machinery. Our key observation is that spatial data can be treated as exactly or approximately exchangeable in a wide range of settings. In particular, under an infill asymptotic regime, we prove that the response values are, in a certain sense, locally approximately exchangeable for a broad class of spatial processes, and we develop a local spatial conformal prediction algorithm that yields valid prediction intervals without strong model assumptions like stationarity. Numerical examples with both real and simulated data confirm that the proposed conformal prediction intervals are valid and generally more efficient than existing model-based procedures for large datasets across a range of nonstationary and non-Gaussian settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available