4.2 Review

Spondylolysis and Isthmic Spondylolisthesis: A Guide to Diagnosis and Management

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE
Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages 1204-1216

Publisher

AMER BOARD FAMILY MEDICINE
DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.220130R1

Keywords

Adolescent; Athletes; Child; Genetics; Low Back Pain; Pain; Pediatrics; Spondylolysis; Spondylolisthesis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spondylolysis and isthmic spondylolisthesis are common organic causes of low back pain in athletes. Comprehensive physical examination and imaging are essential for diagnosis. While conservative management is effective for most patients, some may require surgery. Early diagnosis and treatment in the short term are crucial.
Introduction: Spondylolysis and isthmic spondylolisthesis are commonly implicated as organic causes of low back pain in this population. Many patients involved in sports that require repetitive hyperextension of the lumbar spine like diving, weightlifting, gymnastics and wrestling develop spondylolysis and isthmic spondylolisthesis. While patients are typically asymptomatic in mild forms, the hallmark of symptoms in more advanced disease include low back pain, radiculopathy, postural changes and rarely, neurologic deficits. Methods: We conducted a narrative review of the literature on the clinical presentation, diagnosis, prognosis and management of spondylolysis and isthmic spondylolisthesis. Results: A comprehensive physical exam and subsequent imaging including radiographs, CT and MRI play a role in the diagnosis of this disease process. While the majority of patients improve with conservative management, others require operative management due to persistent symptoms. Conclusion: Due to the risk of disease progression, referral to a spine surgeon is recommended for any patient suspected of having these conditions. This review provides information and guidelines for practitioners to promote an actionable awareness of spondylolysis and isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available