4.5 Article

Should We Hire Our Current Fellow? Hiring Trends and Preferences in Spine Surgery

Journal

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00445

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to provide insight into hiring trends and preferences in Academic Orthopaedic Spine Surgery after fellowship training. The survey of fellowship directors reveals that internal hiring is more common than perceived, especially in larger fellowship programs.
Objective:To provide insight into hiring trends/preferences in Academic Orthopaedic Spine Surgery after fellowship training.Methods:Fellowship directors (FDs) listed by the North American Spine Society were surveyed regarding new faculty hiring preferences. Surveys were analyzed/stratified by response using the Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn multiple comparisons test, the Fisher exact test, and the Mann-Whitney U test for univariate comparisons.Results:Thirty-two of 52 (61.5%) FDs responded. 32.3% of graduated fellows pursued academic medicine, which was preferred by FDs (3.59 +/- 0.67; 1 to 5 scale). From 2015 to 2020, of the 2.25 +/- 1.46 faculty members hired per program, 45.8% were former residents/fellows. Top listed hiring qualities were strong recommendation from a trusted colleague (84.4%), prior personal experience, as a resident/fellow (78.1%), and amicable personality (53.1%). Twelve (38%) answered no, six (19%) yes, and 14 (44%) other, regarding if hiring former residents/fellows benefits the field of spine surgery. Other answers endorsing in-house hiring most commonly mentioned consistency/stability (28.6%) while those opposed most commonly mentioned lack of diversity of training/novel techniques (42.9%). When considering programmatic size, while the stated perception of FDs regarding in-house hiring at larger (>2 fellows) versus smaller (1 to 2 fellows) programs was equivalent, the mean percentage of in-house hires at larger programs (67.8% +/- 35.8%) was significantly greater than that of smaller programs (33.3% +/- 44.8%, P = 0.04).Conclusions:In-house hiring in spine surgery appears to occur more commonly than perceived by program leadership, particularly at larger fellowship programs. Further study of hiring preferences and their impact on the field of spine surgery is warranted.Study Design:Prospective Survey Study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available