4.5 Article

Optimal Pricing and Return-Freight Insurance: Strategic Analysis of E-Sellers in the Presence of Reputation Differentiation

Journal

JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE & COMPLEXITY
Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages 2302-2318

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11424-022-1262-x

Keywords

Game theory; product returns; reputation; return-freight insurance

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71971165]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2021YFB3301801]
  3. MOE Project of Humanities and Social Science of China [19YJE630002]
  4. Soft Science Research Program of Shannxi [2018KRZ005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper explores the RI strategies of competing e-sellers and finds that low-reputation e-sellers are more likely to offer RI, and when sellers are more divergent, they are more likely to co-exist in the market.
Motivated by the practice that e-sellers cooperate with insurance companies to offer consumers the return-freight insurance (RI), this paper aims to investigate the competing e-sellers' RI strategies. Regarding the information asymmetry in the online context, reputation system is widely applied by e-platforms. In an online market with two competing e-sellers that sell the same product but are differentiated in their reputation, this paper builds an analytical model to explore the e-sellers optimal pricing and RI strategies. Combined with sellers' reputation and their RI strategies, the equilibrium outcomes under four cases are discussed. This paper reveals the conditions that e-sellers are willing to offer RI. Specifically, the findings demonstrate that low reputation e-seller is more likely to offer RI. Moreover, when the sellers are more divergent, they are more likely to co-exist in the market. Insurance premium and RI compensation play critical roles in their decisions. RI introduction tends to increase the price, thus offsets the benefits of RI, but does not affect the total consumer surplus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available