4.5 Article

Impact of adjuvant therapy on outcomes after curative-intent resection for distal cholangiocarcinoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 127, Issue 4, Pages 607-615

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jso.27146

Keywords

adjuvant therapy; distal cholangiocarcinoma; lymph node metastasis; perineural invasion; recurrence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the impact of adjuvant therapy (AT) on the long-term survival of patients who underwent curative resection for distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC). The results show that AT is commonly used among patients with DCC, and it significantly improves long-term survival in patients with perineural invasion (PNI) or lymph node metastasis (LNM).
BackgroundThe benefit of adjuvant therapy (AT) after curative resection of distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC) remains unclear. The objective of the current study was to investigate the impact of AT on long-term survival of patients who underwent curative-intent resection for DCC. MethodsPatients who underwent curative-intent resection for DCC between 2000 and 2020 were identified from a multi-institutional database. The primary outcomes included overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). ResultsAmong 245 patients, 150 (61.2%) patients received AT (chemotherapy alone: n = 43; chemo- and radiotherapy: n = 107) after surgical resection, whereas 95 (38.8%) patients underwent surgery only. Patients who received AT were younger, and more likely to have an advanced tumor with the presence of perineural invasion (PNI), lymph node metastasis (LNM), lymph-vascular invasion, and higher T categories (all p < 0.05). Overall, there was no difference in OS (median, surgery + AT 25.5 vs. surgery alone 24.5 months, p = 0.27) or RFS (median, surgery + AT 15.8 vs. surgery alone 18.9 months, p = 0.24) among patients who did versus did not receive AT. In contrast, AT was associated with improved long-term survival among patients with PNI (median OS, surgery + AT 25.9 vs. surgery alone 17.8 months, p = 0.03; median RFS, surgery + AT 15.9 vs. surgery alone 11.9 months, p = 0.04) and LNM (median, surgery + AT 20.0 vs. surgery alone 17.8 months, p = 0.03), but not among patients with no PNI or LNM (all p > 0.1). ConclusionsAT was commonly utilized among patients with DCC. Patients with more advanced disease, including the presence of PNI or LNM, benefited the most from AT with improved long-term outcomes among this subset of patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available