4.6 Article

One fifth of patients with Achilles tendinopathy have symptoms after 10 years: A prospective cohort study

Journal

JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES
Volume 40, Issue 22, Pages 2475-2483

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2022.2163537

Keywords

Achilles tendon; tendinosis; epidemiology; injury prevention

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to investigate if patients with midportion AT have symptoms at 10-year follow-up. The study found that 19% of patients still had persisting symptoms after 10 years. Furthermore, the study also showed that the VISA-A score and sports activity level improved at the 10-year follow-up.
Patients with midportion Achilles tendinopathy (AT) are thought to experience a gradual symptomatic improvement over time. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate if patients with midportion AT have symptoms at 10-year follow-up. Patients withmidportion AT were invited to complete an online questionnaire 10 years after inclusion in an intervention trial. The primary outcomewas the presence of AT symptoms. Secondary outcomes were: the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles tendinopathy (VISA-A, 0-100) score and sports activity level. Of the 54 patientsincluded, 43 (80%) completed the questionnaire at an average follow-up of 10.4 years. Persisting symptoms were reported by 19%. The mean (standard deviation-SD) VISA-A score improved from 52 (17) at baseline to 79 (21) at 10-years follow-up with a mean change of 27 points (95% confidence interval: 21; 35, p < 0.001). Of the 38 active patients, 16 (42%) returned to their pre-injury level sports,of whom 14 (37%) performed them pain free. One-fifth of patients with conservatively treated midportion AT still have symptoms after 10years. One-third of patients were able to perform sports pain-free atpre-injury level. Patients should be adequately counselled to giverealistic expectations. Trial registration number: clinicaltrials.gov (identifier: NCT00761423).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available