4.1 Article

Alternative Service Methods Associated With Increased Participation in the School Breakfast Program

Journal

JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH
Volume 93, Issue 3, Pages 226-234

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/josh.13287

Keywords

school breakfast program; alternative service methods; breakfast in the classroom; second chance breakfast; grab and go breakfast

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that alternative service methods, particularly breakfast in the classroom, are associated with increased participation in school breakfast programs, leading to improved access to adequate nutrition and food security for school children.
BACKGROUND: School breakfast programs (SBP) play an important role in reducing food insecurity and helping provide children with adequate nutrition. Using alternative service methods such as breakfast in the classroom, grab and go, and second chance breakfast may increase student participation. METHODS: We compared the SBP participation of students in 194 Pennsylvania schools that received a mini-grant to support the implementation of an alternative service method to participation in the academic year prior to implementation. In addition, we examined SBP participation in 90 schools that did not receive such a mini-grant to determine the change in participation in these schools over the 2-year period and compared this to the change in participation in schools that did receive a mini-grant. RESULTS: Overall, SBP participation in schools that received the mini-grant increased over the 2-year study period, a change that was not seen in schools that did not receive the mini-grant. The largest increases were seen in schools that implemented the breakfast in the classroom model. CONCLUSIONS: Alternative service methods, particularly breakfast in the classroom, are associated with increased participation in the SBP and therefore increase access to adequate nutrition and food security for school children.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available