4.5 Article

Extended relativistic multiconfiguration calculations of energy levels and transition properties in singly ionized tin

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2022.108392

Keywords

Multiconfiguration Dirac-Hartree-Fock; method; Energy levels; Transition rates; Lifetimes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multiconfiguration Dirac-Hartree-Fock (MCDHF) and relativistic configuration interaction (RCI) calculations were performed for 22 states in singly ionized tin (Sn II), taking into account valence-valence and core-valence correlation effects. The results provide complete and consistent data sets for level energies, wavelengths, oscillator strengths, lifetimes, and transition rates. Comparison with existing theoretical and experimental results shows excellent agreement for calculated excitation energies and good agreement for lifetimes and transition rates.
Multiconfiguration Dirac-Hartree-Fock (MCDHF) and relativistic configuration interaction (RCI) calculations are performed for 22 states in singly ionized tin (Sn II) belonging to the 5 s 2 ns (n = 6 , 7) , 5 s 2 nd (n = 5 , 6) , 5 s 5 p 2 even parity configurations and the 5 s 2 np (n = 5 , 6 , 7) , 5 s 2 4 f odd parity configurations. Valence-valence and core-valence correlation effects are taken into account through configuration state function (CSF) expansions. Complete and consistent data sets of level energies, wavelengths, oscillator strengths, lifetimes and transition rates among all these states are given. The results are compared with existing theoretical and experimental results. There is an excellent agreement for calculated excitation energies with experimental data from the NIST database. Lifetimes and transition rates are also in agreement with the results from previous calculations and available measurements for most of the transitions. (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available