4.8 Article

Discharge intermittency considerably changes ZnO spatial distribution in porous Zn anodes

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 556, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232460

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work demonstrates that rest steps during discharge can dramatically alter the spatial distribution of ZnO in Zn anodes, which in turn affects the performance of the anodes. It was found that in intermittent discharge, the distribution of ZnO differs from that predicted by models. This study has important implications for improving the performance of Zn batteries.
Porous Zn anodes are ubiquitous in primary batteries and are under development for low-cost rechargeable batteries. Spatial distribution of ZnO discharge product is a critical factor in these, because it can passivate the active material. In rechargeable cells this is related to a major failure mechanism called shape change, in which ZnO is relocated to inactive locations. In this work we demonstrate rest steps during discharge of primary Zn anodes dramatically alter the placement of ZnO in the anode. In alkaline electrolyte, ZnO discharge product is typically modeled as precipitating close to Zn particles, forming a porous ZnO shell around the Zn core. Anodes discharged continuously at low-rate are compared to anodes similarly discharged intermittently, using in situ computed tomography from a synchrotron source. Zn-ZnO core-shell structures are produced during continuous discharge but are not found in cells discharged intermittently. Continuously discharged cells showed that ZnO was formed most strongly near the separator, in agreement with Zn anode battery models. In pulse-discharged cells, ZnO was more radially distributed and was in large formations not physically connected to Zn particles. Thus, discharge intermittency changes spatial distribution of ZnO in ways that are unpredicted by Zn anode models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available