4.8 Article

Contact resistance measurement methods for PEM fuel cell bipolar plates and terminals

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 555, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232341

Keywords

Electrical contact resistance; PEMFC; GDL; Aluminium; NiP; NiSn

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes new application-specific methods for measuring contact resistance and compares them with methods from references and standards. The results show that changing the measurement setup can reduce uncertainty and eliminate the influence of probe resistance on measurement results. Furthermore, the study finds that different accelerated durability tests have varying effects on the contact resistance of the power terminal.
The electrical contact resistance is a key parameter for optimising both the bipolar plate of the polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) and the electrical contact of the power terminal of the stack. The contact resistance is affected by the conductivity, roughness, and hardness of the two contacting surfaces. Here, new, application-specific contact resistance measurement methods are proposed for both the stack power terminal, and the bipolar plate. The proposed methods are compared to methods from references as well as standards, and it is concluded that the uncertainty of the measurements can be reduced by changing the measurement setup, and that the influence of probe resistance on measurement results can be eliminated. Furthermore, the effect of different accelerated durability tests on the contact resistance of the power terminal is examined both on test coupons and on a prototype screw connection with an electroless NiP and an electroplated NiSn coatings. As expected, the NiSn coupons gives lower contact resistance after ageing as compared to the NiP. However, the increase in contact resistance seen on coupons after ageing is not observed on the prototype screw connection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available