4.3 Article

Self-filling enclosures to experimentally assess plankton response to pulse nutrient enrichments

Journal

JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH
Volume 45, Issue 2, Pages 266-277

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/plankt/fbac074

Keywords

microcosms; mesocosms; nutrient additions; experimental plankton perturbations; phytoplankton; protists; lake field experiments

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Experimental nutrient additions are important for studying plankton ecology. A new enclosure type is described that minimizes manipulation of planktonic communities. This enclosure design is inexpensive, easy to build, and can be used in lakes that are difficult to reach.
Experimental nutrient additions are a fundamental approach to investigating plankton ecology. Possibilities range from whole-lake fertilization to flask assays encompassing a trade-off between closeness to the real world and feasibility and replication. Here we describe an enclosure type that minimizes the manipulation of planktonic communities during the enclosure filling. The enclosure (typically similar to 100 L volume) consists of a narrow translucent cylinder that can comprise the entire photic zone (or a large part of it in clear deep lakes, e.g. 20-m long) and holds a sediment trap at the bottom for recovering the sinking material. The enclosures are inexpensive and straightforward to build. Thus, many can be used in an experiment, favoring the diversity of treatments and the number of replicates. They also are lightweight with easy transport and use in lakes that cannot be reached by road. The enclosures are fundamentally aimed at investigating the short-term response of the planktonic community, integrated across the photic zone, to pulse perturbations using before and after comparisons and multiple replication and treatments. The pros and cons of the enclosure design are evaluated based on experience gained in Lake Redon, a high mountain ultraoligotrophic deep lake in the Pyrenees.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available