4.6 Article

Intermediate determinism in general probabilistic theories

Journal

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1751-8121/aca0d0

Keywords

general probabilistic theories; Gleason's theorem; foundations of quantum theory; axiomatisations of quantum theory; property lattices

Funding

  1. European Union [754510]
  2. Government of Spain [FIS2020-TRANQI, CEX2019-000910-S]
  3. Fundacio Cellex
  4. Fundacio Mir-Puig
  5. Generalitat de Catalunya (CERCA) [AGAUR SGR 1381]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantum theory exhibits a form of intermediate determinism where the actual properties of a system in a pure state determine the probability of other properties, a concept extended from properties to measurements. This observation is guaranteed by the lattice structure of properties and can be applied to separable Hilbert spaces of any dimension.
Quantum theory is indeterministic, but not completely so. When a system is in a pure state there are properties it possesses with certainty, known as actual properties. The actual properties of a quantum system (in a pure state) fully determine the probability of finding the system to have any other property. We will call this principle, wherein the deterministic elements of a theory completely characterise the probabilistic elements, intermediate determinism. In dimensions of at least three, intermediate determinism in quantum theory is guaranteed by the structure of its lattice of properties. This observation follows from Gleason's theorem, which is why it fails to hold in dimension two. In this work we extend the idea of intermediate determinism from properties to measurements. Under this extension intermediate determinism follows from the structure of quantum effects for separable Hilbert spaces of any dimension, including dimension two. Then, we find necessary and sufficient conditions for a general probabilistic theory to obey intermediate determinism. We show that, although related, both the no-restriction hypothesis and a Gleason-type theorem are neither necessary nor sufficient for intermediate determinism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available