4.8 Article

Slower Auger Recombination in 12-Faceted Dodecahedron CsPbBr3 Nanocrystals

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages 1066-1072

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c03389

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the past two decades, research has focused on suppressing Auger recombination in metal-chalcogenide and perovskite nanocrystals (PNCs) for photovoltaic and light emitting device (LED) applications. A study examined dodecahedron cesium lead bromide perovskite nanocrystals (DNCs) and found that they exhibit slower Auger recombination compared to hexahedron nanocrystals (HNCs). The research demonstrates that multiexciton recombinations result in lower Auger recombination rates in DNCs than in HNCs.
Over the past two decades, intensive research efforts have been devoted to suppressions of Auger recombination in metal-chalcogenide and perovskite nanocrystals (PNCs) for the application of photovoltaics and light emitting devices (LEDs). Here, we have explored dodecahedron cesium lead bromide perovskite nanocrystals (DNCs), which show slower Auger recombination time compared to hexahedron nanocrystals (HNCs). We investigate many-body interactions that are manifested under high excitation flux density in both NCs using ultrafast spectroscopic pump-probe measurements. We demonstrate that the Auger recombination rate due to multiexciton recombinations are lower in DNCs than in HNCs. At low and intermediate excitation density, the majority of carriers recombine through biexcitonic recombination. However, at high excitation density (>1018 cm-3) a higher number of many-body Auger process dominates over biexcitonic recombination. Compared to HNCs, high PLQY and slower Auger recombinations in DNCs are likely to be significant for the fabrication of highly efficient perovskite-based photonics and LEDs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available