4.8 Article

Examining the Long-Range Effect in Very Long Graphene Nanoribbons: A First-Principles Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages 11223-11229

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c03184

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22025304, 22033007]
  2. CAS Project for Young Scientists in Basic Research [YSBR-005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research introduces a computational method for studying the electronic structure of large-size molecules with random doping and arbitrary geometry. The study reveals that both dopants and curvature can change the charge distribution of graphene nanoribbons (GNRs), with dopants having a more significant impact extending up to 1-3 nm. The electronic excitation properties of GNRs are also greatly modified by the doping state or nonuniform curvature.
The role of long-range effect on the modulation of the electronic structure of graphene nanoribbons has been little studied due to the limitations of existing theoretical and computational methods. By splitting a molecule top-down and calculating and jointing the Fock matrix of fragments, we developed a computational method suitable for large-size molecules with random doping and arbitrary geometry. Utilizing this method, we achieved the study of the effects of dopants and curvature on graphene nanoribbons (GNRs). It reveals that both dopants and curvature can change the charge distribution of GNRs, while the influence of dopants is more significant and can extend up to 1-3 nm. The electronic excitation properties of GNRs are also largely modified by the doping state or nonuniform curvature. Our findings provide not only a feasible approach for studying the electronic structure of large-size molecules but also the possibility to improve the properties of graphene-based materials by dopants and local curvature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available