4.6 Article

Validating and Utilizing Machine Learning Methods to Investigate the Impacts of Synthesis Parameters in Gold Nanoparticle Synthesis

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 127, Issue 2, Pages 1117-1125

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c07578

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Controlling the synthesis of gold nanoparticles is crucial for their optimal optical and processing properties, but the complex and interdependent nature of the synthesis process makes it challenging. Machine learning algorithms were applied to analyze the correlation between synthesis parameters, optical spectra, and size in the seed-mediated synthesis of gold nanoparticles. The Random Forest model was selected as it could successfully reproduce the synthesis outcome, and further analysis revealed chemical relationships derived solely from data analysis using SHAP.
The control over the synthesis of gold nanoparticles is crucial to ensure optimal optical and processing properties, but synthesis is complex and interdependent on many variables such as reducing agent, capping agent, and the amount of gold seeds and precursor. Machine learning offers the prospect of giving insight into this multidimensional problem, but the reason for selecting a certain model is often unclear. Here, we apply tree-based machine learning algorithms on the semi-batch, seed-mediated synthesis of gold nanoparticles in the size range of 20-120 nm to analyze the correlation between synthesis parameters, optical spectra, and size. After testing the validity of the machine learning models by nested cross-validation, the Random Forest model is selected as a simple model that can reproduce the outcome of the synthesis well. In a further analysis by SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations), chemical relationships that were not explicitly taught to the model but purely derived from the data analysis are revealed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available