4.6 Article

Effect of Composition and Local Environment on CO2 Adsorption on Nickel and Magnesium Oxide Solid Solutions

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 126, Issue 46, Pages 19705-19714

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c05799

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Institute for Catalysis in Energy Processes (ICEP) via the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences
  2. [DOE DE-FG02-03ER15457]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study calculates the CO2 adsorption energies on different surfaces of nickel oxide doped with Mg, magnesium oxide doped with Ni, and their solid solution. The results show that the adsorption energy is mainly influenced by electronic interactions, and a single substitution in magnesium oxide doped with nickel can create stronger CO2 binding sites. This research provides guidance for tailoring the Lewis basicity of metal oxides.
CO2 adsorption energies on the (100) surfaces of a nickel oxide doped with Mg, magnesium oxide doped with Ni, and their 50:50 solid solution were calculated using density functional theory. The composition and atomic arrangement of the adsorption site were varied to understand how the local environment affects CO2 adsorption and the basicity of the surfaces at the atomic level. The dispersive and electronic contributions to the adsorption energies were quantified, and the results indicate that the variation of the adsorption energy with adsorption site configuration and metal composition is dominated by electronic interactions. Interestingly, for magnesium oxide doped with nickel, a single substitution can create stronger CO2 binding sites, which implies stronger basic sites, even though nickel oxide is less basic than magnesium oxide. The effect of double substitution at the binding site can be reasonably approximated by summing the effects of single substitutions. This work provides guidance for the preparation of metal oxides with tailored Lewis basicity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available