4.6 Article

Validation of the Electronic Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised with Follow-Up: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
Volume 262, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.11.044

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study compares the classification rates and screening properties of the web-based and paper-phone versions of Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddler, Revised with Follow-Up (M-CHAT-R/F). The results show that both modalities have high sensitivity and specificity, but the web-based modality has a higher accuracy in predicting autism risk for children in the medium-risk range, and it eliminates the delay between initial screening and Follow-Up.
Objective To examine the classification rates and screening properties, including sensitivity and specificity, of the web-based Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddler, Revised with Follow-Up (M-CHAT-R/F) compared with paper-phone administration, and to determine the extent to which electronic M-CHAT-R/F streamlines screening, increases screening fidelity, increases diagnostic evaluation participation, and decreases waiting time from screening to evaluation compared with paper-phone modality. Study design Primary-care practices in urban and suburban settings administered either the web-based or paper-phone M-CHAT-R/F using a prospective nonrandomized control design. Toddlers (n = 17 900) were screened between 2009 and 2016 at routine well-child check-ups. Toddlers who screened at risk on the M-CHAT-R/F were invited to complete diagnostic evaluations; 176 children were diagnosed with autism. The chi(2), Fisher exact, and t-tests, as well as regression and screening properties, were used to compare outcome distributions, screening properties, and implementation by modality. Results Classification rates of the initial M-CHAT-R into low, medium, and high risk were significantly different across modalities with very small effect sizes. Sensitivity and specificity were high across both modalities. For children in the medium-risk range, the web-based modality had a greater rate of predicting risk for autism after Follow-Up compared with the paper-phone modality, and the web eliminated delay between initial screen and Follow-Up. The web-based modality showed increased screening fidelity, no data loss, and similar rates of evaluation attendance and time to evaluation from Follow-Up administration. Conclusions The web-based M-CHAT-R/F is a valid tool for universal autism screening. Systems-level decisions should balance the increased feasibility of the electronic administration with the increase in Follow-Up accuracy provided by skilled clinician interview.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available