4.0 Article

Use of Trametinib in Children and Young Adults With Progressive Low-grade Glioma and Glioneuronal Tumors

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY ONCOLOGY
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages E464-E470

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000002598

Keywords

low-grade glioma; pediatrics; therapy; trametinib; outcomes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A retrospective chart review showed that trametinib is effective and well-tolerated in patients with progressive low-grade glioma. The best radiographic response was seen after a longer duration of therapy, and patients with optic pathway lesions showed stable to improved vision while on treatment.
Low-grade gliomas/glioneuronal tumors comprise one-third of all pediatric-type CNS tumors. These tumors are generally caused by activating mutations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. Targeted drugs, such as trametinib, have shown promise in other cancers and are being utilized in low-grade gliomas. A retrospective chart review was conducted to evaluate radiographic response, visual outcomes, tolerability, and durability of response in progressive circumscribed low-grade gliomas treated with trametinib. Eleven patients were treated with trametinib. The best radiographic response was 2/11 partial response, 3/11 minor response, 3/11 stable disease, and 3/13 progressive disease. In the patients with partial or minor response, the best response was seen after longer durations of therapy; 4 of 5 best responses occurred after at least 9 months of therapy with a median of 21 months. Patients with optic pathway tumors showed at least stable vision throughout treatment, with 3 having improved vision on treatment. Trametinib is effective and well-tolerated in patients with progressive low-grade glioma. Best responses were seen after a longer duration of therapy in those with a positive response. Patients with optic pathway lesions showed stable to improved vision while on treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available