4.3 Article

Delayed inputs of hot 137Cs and 241Am particles from Chernobyl to sediments from three Finnish lakes: implications for sediment dating

Journal

JOURNAL OF PALEOLIMNOLOGY
Volume 69, Issue 4, Pages 293-303

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10933-022-00273-6

Keywords

Lake sediments; Cs-137 dating; Chernobyl fallout; Finland; Hot particles; Post-depositional transport

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Anomalous peaks observed in the Cs-137 and Am-241 records of sediment cores from three lakes in southern Finland are likely caused by the presence of micron-size hot radioactive particles, originated from the fallout of the 1986 Chernobyl accident. The particles were initially deposited in the catchment areas of the lakes and transported to the lakes several years later. Care should be taken when using Cs-137 or Am-241 as chronostratigraphic markers in areas contaminated by Chernobyl fallout due to the delayed input of such particles into sedimentary records.
Anomalous peaks in the Cs-137 and Am-241 records from three lake sediment cores from southern Finland appear to be due to the presence of micron-size hot radioactive particles, almost certainly originating in fallout from the 1986 Chernobyl accident. Since the imbedding sediments all post-date 1986 by several decades, it appears that they were initially deposited on the catchments of these lakes and transported to the lakes some years later. The activities of the particles were determined using a sequential splitting process. Two of the particles were found to contain Cs-137 with activities of 64 +/- 4 mBq and 266 +/- 15 mBq respectively. The third contained Am-241 with an activity of 17 +/- 2 mBq, but no evidence of significant amounts of Cs-137. The delayed input of such particles into the sedimentary records highlights the need for care in using Cs-137 or Am-241 as chronostratigraphic markers in areas subject to significant levels of contamination from Chernobyl fallout.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available