4.7 Article

Studies on the Regioselective Rearrangement of Azanorbornanic Aminyl Radicals into 2,8-Diazabicyclo[3.2.1]oct-2-ene Systems

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.2c02201

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion - MCIN/AEI [PID2020-116460RB-100, RTI2018-099592-B-C22]
  2. Consejeria de Transformacion Econo mica, Industria, Conocimiento y Universidades-Junta de Andalucia (PAIDI) [P20-00532]
  3. Ministerio de Educacion, Cultura y Deporte
  4. University of Seville (VI Plan Propio de Investigacion y Transferencia)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study highlights the regioselective rearrangement of aminyl radicals, leading to the formation of novel bicyclic diazabicyclic compounds. The research explores the impact of different bridgehead atoms and substituents on the rearrangement reaction, while providing a detailed mechanistic proposal supported by computational studies.
Aminyl radicals are nitrogen-centered radicals of interest in synthetic strategies involving C-N bond formation due to their high reactivity. These intermediate radicals are generated by the reaction of an organic azide with tributyltin hydride (Bu3SnH) in the presence of substoichiometric amounts of azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN). In this work, we report the regioselective rearrangement of azanorbornanic ([2.2.1]azabicyclic) aminyl radicals into 2,8-diazabicyclo[3.2.1]oct-2-ene systems. With the aim to establish the structural requirements for this ring expansion, we have studied the effect of different bridgehead atoms of the [2.2.1]bicyclic system and the presence of an alkyl substituent at C4. Attempts to perform this ring expansion on a monocyclic analogue have been also explored to evaluate the influence of the bicyclic skeleton on the rearrangement. A detailed mechanistic proposal supported by computational studies is reported.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available