4.6 Article

Estimation of Hydration and Density of Fat-Free Mass in Indian Children Using a 4-Compartment Model: Implications for the Estimation of Body Composition Using 2-Compartment Models

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 153, Issue 2, Pages 435-442

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2022.12.025

Keywords

density of fat-free mass; hydration of fat-free mass; densitometry; hydrometry; pediatric body composition; 4-compartment (4C) model; 2-compartment (2C) model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that previously published constants for measuring body fat mass in South Asian children do not accurately reflect the actual conditions in this population. Using these constants may lead to errors in measuring body fat mass. Therefore, more accurate methods are needed when measuring body fat mass in South Asian children.
Background: Accurate methods are needed to measure body fat mass (FM), particularly in South Asian children who are thought to have greater adiposity for a given body size. The accuracy of simple 2-compartment (2C) models of measuring FM depends on the primary measurement of the fat free mass (FFM) and the validity of assumed constants for FFM hydration and density. These have not been measured in this particular ethnic group.Objectives: To measure FFM hydration and density in South Indian children using a 4-compartment (4C) model and to compare FM es-timates from this 4C-model with 2C-model-based estimates from hydrometry and densitometry, using literature-reported FFM hydration and density in children.Methods: This study included 299 children (45% boys), aged 6-16 y from Bengaluru, India. Total body water (TBW), bone mineral content (BMC), and body volume were measured using deuterium dilution, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and air displacement plethysmog-raphy, respectively, to calculate the FFM hydration and density, and the FM using 4C and 2C models. The agreement between FM estimates from 2C and 4C models was also evaluated. Results: Mean FFM hydration and density were 74.2% +/- 2.1% and 71.4% +/- 2.0% and 1.095 +/- 0.008 kg/L and 1.105 +/- 0.008 kg/L in boys and girls respectively, which were significantly different from published values. Using the presently estimated constants, the mean hydrometry-based FM (as % body weight) estimates decreased by 3.5% but increased by 5.2% for densitometry-based 2C methods. When 2C-FM (using previously reported FFM hydration and density) were compared with 4C-FM estimates, the mean difference was -1.1 +/- 0.9 kg for hydrometry and 1.6 +/- 1.1 kg for densitometry.Conclusions: Previously published constants of hydration and density of FFM may induce errors of -12% to +17% in FM (kg) when using different 2C models in comparison to the 4C models in Indian children. J Nutr 20xx;x:xx.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available