4.7 Article

Systematic study of radiation-induced segregation in neutron-irradiated FeCrAl alloys

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS
Volume 574, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2022.154205

Keywords

Radiation-induced segregation; FeCrAl; Accident tolerant fuel; Neutron irradiation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study systematically reports the grain boundary radiation-induced segregation (RIS) and its mechanisms in FeCrAl alloys, emphasizing the need to consider RIS implications on corrosion and oxidation susceptibility in alloy design.
This work systematically reports grain boundary radiation-induced segregation (RIS), and insights into RIS mechanisms, in FeCrAl alloys. Recently, FeCrAl alloys have received significant attention as direct re-placement accident tolerant fuel (ATF) claddings for light water cooled nuclear reactors, because of their corrosion and high-temperature oxidation resistance characteristics. One degradation method not studied in detail is RIS, which could sufficiently alter grain boundary chemistry, potentially compromising the superior aqueous corrosion resistance. This study focuses on candidate ATF FeCrAl alloys C06M, C35M, C36M, and C37M that are neutron irradiated to 1.8 displacements per atom (dpa) at 357 degrees C. Grain bound-ary Cr enrichment and Al depletion are observed in all irradiated alloys that span the 10-13 wt.% Cr and 5-6 wt.% Al composition space. Fe will either enrich or deplete at grain boundaries to balance the grain boundary composition. The Cr enrichment is attributed to interstitial diffusion, consistent with that in body centric cubic 9-12 wt.% Cr steels. The depletion of Al occurs through the same mechanisms as alpha - alpha' phase partitioning previously observed in FeCrAl alloys. This study underscores the need for FeCrAl alloy design to consider RIS implications on corrosion and oxidation susceptibility.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available