Details matter in quality science. Adopting a checklist for magnetic resonance spectroscopy can help you get them right

The ISMRM study group on magnetic resonance spectroscopy has produced recommendations for reporting methods. The Journal of Neurochemistry has decided to encourage the use of the checklist for these standards by authors and reviewers in order to improve reproducibility and reliability of the science, make it easier for reviewers and to help educate the scientific community. Here, we explain why getting the details right is important.

Automated summary

The ISMRM study group has made recommendations for reporting methods in magnetic resonance spectroscopy and the Journal of Neurochemistry has decided to promote the use of a checklist based on these standards. This aims to enhance reproducibility and reliability of scientific research, facilitate the work of reviewers, and contribute to the education of the scientific community.