4.7 Article

Zavitsas? model of aqueous NaF solution activities utilizing hydration numbers reported from Dielectric Relaxation spectroscopy

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS
Volume 375, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2023.121387

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dielectric Relaxation Spectroscopy (DRS) measures the number of irrotationally bound water molecules to electrolytes, similar to the hydration number in Zavitsas' model. The present study uses DRS data to replace the hydration number in Zavitsas' model and optimizes the extent of dissociation of NaF to fit water activity data. The results show that DRS can be used to parameterize Zavitsas' model.
Dielectric Relaxation Spectroscopy (DRS) measures the number of water molecules irrotationally bound to electrolytes, which is a similar concept to the hydration number in Zavitsas' model of electrolyte solution thermodynamics. Zavitsas' model assumes that some water molecules are bound to electrolytes so strongly that they act as part of the electrolyte rather than the solvent. Most monovalent electrolytes have linear water activity versus concentration plots at low concentrations and many sparingly soluble electrolytes like NaF are only soluble in the linear region. Multiparameter models fit to this data are statistically overparametrized. The present study relieves overparameterization by substituted the number of irrotationally bound water molecules determined by DRS for the hydration number in Zavitsas' model and then optimized the NaF extent of dissociation (i(e)) to best fit water activity data. This i(e) value was consistent with and could be predicted by The Law of Matching Water Affinities. Using the resulting model parameters, the solubility of NaF was predicted in aqueous NaNO3 solutions without having to optimize any parameters to the solubility data. These results demonstrates that DRS can be used to parametrize Zavitsas' model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available