4.7 Article

Discovery of Clinical Candidate AZD0095, a Selective Inhibitor of Monocarboxylate Transporter 4 (MCT4) for Oncology

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages 384-397

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01342

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to increased reliance on glycolysis, monocarboxylate transporters (MCTs) are upregulated in cancer. MCT4 inhibition can lead to cytotoxic levels of intracellular lactate and may be of interest for immuno-oncology. A triazolopyrimidine hit was identified as a potential MCT4 inhibitor, and further modifications were made to improve potency, selectivity, and other properties. The resulting clinical candidate 15 (AZD0095) has excellent potency, MCT1 selectivity, clean mechanism of action, suitable properties for oral administration, and good preclinical efficacy.
Due to increased reliance on glycolysis, which produces lactate, monocarboxylate transporters (MCTs) are often upregulated in cancer. MCT4 is associated with the export of lactic acid from cancer cells under hypoxia, so inhibition of MCT4 may lead to cytotoxic levels of intracellular lactate. In addition, tumor derived lactate is known to be immunosuppressive, so MCT4 inhibition may be of interest for immuno-oncology. At the outset, no potent and selective MCT4 inhibitors had been reported, but a screen identified a triazolopyrimidine hit, with no close structural analogues. Minor modifications to the triazolopyrimidine were made, alongside design of a constrained linker and broad SAR exploration of the biaryl tail to improve potency, physical properties, PK, and hERG. The resulting clinical candidate 15 (AZD0095) has excellent potency (1.3 nM), MCT1 selectivity (>1000x), secondary pharmacology, clean mechanism of action, suitable properties for oral administration in the clinic, and good preclinical efficacy in combination with cediranib.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available