4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Exosomes secreted from bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells protect the intestines from experimental necrotizing enterocolitis

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY
Volume 51, Issue 6, Pages 942-947

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.02.061

Keywords

Mesenchymal stem cells; Exosomes; Necrotizing enterocolitis; NEC

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM113236] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Treatment options for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) remain inadequate. Bonemarrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) can protect the intestines from NEC. Exosomes are nanoparticle-sized vesicles with important cell signaling capabilities. The objective of this study was to determine whether BM-MSC-derived exosomes can prevent NEC. Methods: Rat pups were either breast fed (Group 1) or subjected to experimental NEC and randomized to receive either no treatment (Group 2) or an intraperitoneal (IP) injection of PBS (Group 3), BM-MSC (Group 4), or BM-MSC-derived exosomes (Group 5). Histologic injury grade and intestinal permeability were determined. The effect of BM-MSC-derived exosomes on IEC-6 intestinal epithelial cells in an in vitro scrape model of wound healing was also determined. Results: Animals exposed to NEC that were either untreated or received PBS alone had an NEC incidence of 46% and 41%, respectively (p = 0.61). Compared to untreated pups, the incidence of NEC was significantly lower in pups treated with either BM-MSC (9%, p=0.0003) or MB-MSC-derived exosomes (13%, p=0.0008). Similar results were found for intestinal permeability. Wound healing in IEC-6 cells was significantly increased by BM-MSC-derived exosomes. Conclusion: BM-MSC-derived exosomes protect the intestines from NEC and may represent a novel, cell-free, preventative therapy for NEC in the future. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available