4.5 Article

An Experimental Investigation on Microstructure and Mechanical Property of Asymmetric Warm-Rolled Fe-27Mn-3Si-4Al TWIP Steel

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS ENGINEERING AND PERFORMANCE
Volume 32, Issue 15, Pages 6704-6716

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11665-022-07593-8

Keywords

asymmetric; mechanical property; texture; TWIP steel; warm rolling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microstructure, texture and mechanical property of Fe-27Mn-3Si-4Al TWIP steels during asymmetric warm rolling were investigated. It was found that the asymmetry of the rolling process can significantly refine the microstructure and affect the texture evolution of the steels. The combination of applied asymmetry rolling at elevated reduction resulted in a high yield strength on one hand and a reasonably high elongation on the other hand. The study provides important insights into the effects of asymmetric warm rolling on the properties of TWIP steels.
Microstructure, texture and mechanical property of Fe-27Mn-3Si-4Al TWIP steels during asymmetric warm rolling were studied. It was found that asymmetric warm rolling strongly refined the microstructures and affected texture evolution of steels because of an additional shear strain in contrast to the symmetric warm rolling. The complete recrystallization occurred on the upper and central layer of sheet, and Goss and Brass textures was developed into gamma-fiber and R-Copper {112} textures when the velocity ratio increased to 1.2. The combination of applied asymmetry rolling at elevated reduction resulted in a high yield strength (706 MPa) due to the enhanced shear deformation on the one hand and a reasonably high elongation (26.3%) on the other hand which was attributable to the grain fragmentation at higher velocity ratio, while the significant enhancement of ductility (30.9%) was achieved by the higher dislocation activation due to the decrease of rolling reduction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available