4.4 Article

Life cycle inventory of recycled aggregates derived from construction and demolition waste

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIAL CYCLES AND WASTE MANAGEMENT
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages 1082-1095

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10163-023-01594-y

Keywords

Life cycle assessment; Environmental indicators; Construction and demolition; Circular economy; CO2 emissions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to identify environmental aspects that can be improved during the derivation of recycled aggregates (RAs) from construction and demolition waste (CDW). The Life Cycle Inventory of RAs is established, considering the gate to gate scope. The study highlights the importance of optimizing transport emissions in the environmental impact of recycled aggregates.
This study is performed to identify environmental aspects that can be improved during the derivation of recycled aggregates (RAs) from construction and demolition waste (CDW). The Life Cycle Inventory of RAs is established by considering the gate to gate scope. Primary data acquired by a Brazilian CDW processing company are used. The result shows that, to derive 1 m(3) of RAs, the amount of raw material (i.e., CDW) required is 1.01 to 1.67 m(3). The output includes embodied energy and water measuring 2.22-4.35 MJ/m(3) and 15.38-30.30 L/m(3), respectively; meanwhile, the CO2 emission from the beneficiation process is 5.07-6.20 kg center dot CO2/m(3). Transport emissions are also significant in the environmental impact of recycled aggregates. CO2 emission associated with the transport of CDW and RAs is investigated, in which transport is optimized and non-optimized when the CO2 emission is 0.27-7.68 and 0.53-15.35 kgCO(2)/m(3), respectively. This study is relevant to the circular economy and corroborates the closure of the life cycle of materials used in the civil construction sector by identifying the effects of CDW recycling and RA derivation, as well as their application in civil construction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available