4.3 Article

Deconvolution of 1D NMR spectra: A deep learning-based approach

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE
Volume 347, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2022.107357

Keywords

NMR Spectroscopy; Deconvolution; Machine learning; Deep learning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The analysis of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra to detect peaks and characterize their parameters, often referred to as deconvolution, is a crucial step in the quantification, elucidation, and verification of the structure of molecular systems. We propose a robust, expert-level quality deep learning-based deconvolution algorithm for 1D experimental NMR spectra. Our algorithm demonstrates superior performance compared to expert results in challenging spectra.
The analysis of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra to detect peaks and characterize their parameters, often referred to as deconvolution, is a crucial step in the quantification, elucidation, and verification of the structure of molecular systems. However, deconvolution of 1D NMR spectra is a challenge for both experts and machines. We propose a robust, expert-level quality deep learning-based deconvolution algorithm for 1D experimental NMR spectra. The algorithm is based on a neural network trained on synthetic spectra. Our customized pre-processing and labeling of the synthetic spectra enable the estimation of critical peak parameters. Furthermore, the neural network model transfers well to the experimental spectra and demonstrates low fitting errors and sparse peak lists in challenging scenarios such as crowded, high dynamic range, shoulder peak regions as well as broad peaks. We demonstrate in challenging spectra that the proposed algorithm is superior to expert results.(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available